Mosquito Misting System Installation Pricing Calculator: what to charge
Price a misting system install per nozzle: nozzle and tubing time, pump set-up, zone kits, hardware markup and drive time, then the refill contract behind it.
How this is calculated
The install is a straight build-up from the nozzle count and the tubing run the planner gave you. Three things behave deliberately: install hours are crew-hours and crew size does not multiply them, drive time is tracked twice, and the refill contract is priced apart from the install so neither one subsidises the other.
nozzleH = nozzles × minutesPerNozzle ÷ 60
tubingH = tubingFt ÷ 100 × minutesPerRun ÷ 60
taskH = nozzleH + tubingH + pumpSetUp + commissioning + extra
elapsed = taskH ÷ crewSize
driveCrewH = driveHours × crewSize
billedDrv = driveCrewH × driveBillPct
labour = (taskH + billedDrv) × chargeRate
zonesNeed = ceil(nozzles ÷ nozzlesPerZone)
hardware = (pump + zoneKits × kitCost + nozzles × costPerNozzle
+ tubingFt ÷ 100 × costPerRun + consumables) × (1 + markup)
subtotal = labour + hardware + addOns
install = max(subtotal, jobMinimum)
perNozzle = install ÷ nozzles
tax = install × taxRate
cost = (taskH + driveCrewH) × costRate + hardwareAtCost
margin = (install − cost) ÷ install
refillYr = visitsPerYear × pricePerVisit
refillCost = visitsPerYear × (concentrate + visitHours × costRate)
yearOne = install + refillYr Worked example. A 30-nozzle drum system on 600 ft of tubing at the seeded 12 minutes per nozzle and 20 minutes per 100 ft, 2 crew-hours to stand the pump up and 1 to commission it, two technicians at a 95 charge-out rate and a 45-minute round trip that is not billed, with an 1,800 pump, 22 per nozzle assembly, 45 per 100 ft of tubing and 60 of consumables, marked up 25%. The nozzles are 6 crew-hours and the tubing 2, so the install is 11 crew-hours of work content, about 5.5 h on site with two techs, and 1,045 of labor. Hardware is 2,790 at cost and 3,487.50 charged. The install prices at 4,532.50 before tax, which is 151.08 per nozzle, and across 12.5 paid crew-hours it returns 362.60 per paid crew-hour. Six refills a year at 165 add 990 of recurring revenue, for a year one of 5,522.50.
Every constant on this page, and where it comes from. The only hard conversions are arithmetic: 60 minutes to the hour, 100 ft to a tubing run, and 0.3048 m to the foot (which is also what converts a rate quoted per 100 m onto the per-100-ft basis). Everything else that opens with a number is a tool-local scoping convention in an editable box: 12 minutes per nozzle, 20 minutes per 100 ft of tubing, 2 crew-hours to stand up a drum system and 3.5 for a tankless unit, and 1 crew-hour to commission. Nobody measured those for your market and no source publishes them. Their only claim is ordering: a tankless unit plumbed into the water supply takes longer to stand up than a drum on a pad. Replace them after your first few timed installs.
No price presets anywhere. Every currency field starts empty, including the pump, the nozzle assembly, the tubing, the refill price and the charge-out rate. The figures deliberately not fabricated here are any price per nozzle, any pump or tank price and any refill price, because the published versions of all three resolve to directories citing each other rather than to a regulator, a trade body or a survey.
Zones are a coupled side effect, and the tool says so. A pump drives a rated number of nozzles. Add nozzles past that rating and the design needs another zone or another pump, which is a hardware line, not a labour one, and it is exactly what a flat price per nozzle hides. Enter the rating off your pump's spec sheet and the calculator checks the nozzle count against the zone kits actually in the quote. The nozzle count and the zone split themselves are a design question: work them out in the nozzle planner and bring the answer here.
The margin check prices the install only. When a refill contract is quoted, its annual value and its own margin are reported separately, because those visits carry costs of their own and counting their revenue against the install's cost would manufacture margin out of nothing. Both blocks are all or nothing: without a cost per crew-hour the labour half of the cost is unknown, so neither appears.
Everything runs in your browser. No account, no email gate, nothing stored or sent.
What this prices, and what the planner next door does
A misting system arrives already designed: somebody has walked the perimeter, set a nozzle spacing, counted the points and measured the tubing run. That is the mosquito misting nozzle planner’s job, and it answers a different question from this page. Bring its nozzle count and its tubing run over here and this calculator prices the install, per nozzle, then prices the refill contract that follows it.
The split matters because the two halves scale differently. Install time comes out of the design: minutes per nozzle times the count, plus the tubing run, plus standing the pump up and commissioning it. Hardware comes out of your supplier invoices. Neither is a function of the other, and a flat price per nozzle quietly assumes both.
Every currency box starts empty, and the time boxes are not sources either
No regulator, trade body or published survey gives a price per nozzle, a pump price, a tubing price or a refill price. The figures in circulation are homeowner lead directories quoting each other. Under this site’s cite-or-omit rule the tool ships none of them, and those four are exactly the numbers deliberately not fabricated here.
Four time boxes do open with a value, and it is worth being blunt about what they are. The 12 minutes per nozzle, the 20 minutes per 100 ft of tubing, the 2 and 3.5 crew-hours to stand up a drum system and a tankless unit respectively, and the commissioning hour are tool-local scoping conventions. Nobody measured them for your market and no source publishes them. Their only claim is ordering: a tankless unit plumbed into the water supply takes longer to stand up than a drum on a pad, because somebody has to make a water connection as well as a power one. They sit in editable boxes so the page opens with a working shape, and your first few timed installs should replace them.
If you have not yet set a defensible charge-out rate to put in the rate box, the service hourly rate calculator and the labor burden rate calculator are where that number comes from.
Zones are the step a price per nozzle hides
Everything else on this page moves smoothly with the nozzle count. Zones do not. A pump drives a rated number of nozzles and then it stops, and the next nozzle costs you a whole kit or a whole second pump rather than another twelve minutes. Enter the rating off your own pump’s spec sheet and the calculator checks the count against the zone kits actually in the quote, so a 31st nozzle announces itself while you are quoting instead of on install day. What the zone split should be is a design decision, not a pricing one, and it belongs back in the planner.
The same logic runs through the tubing line. Tubing is priced per run, so the distance from the pump to the furthest nozzle is a cost, not a detail, and a quote with nozzles in it and no tubing behind it is incomplete: the tool says so rather than letting it pass.
Crew size does not multiply the work, it divides the day
The install times here are work content expressed in crew-hours, so a second technician does not double the hours, it halves the elapsed time on site. Where crew size does multiply is the drive, because everyone in the truck is paid for the trip. Drive time then behaves as it does everywhere else on this site: every drive hour lands in your cost whether or not you bill a minute of it, and only the share you nominate lands in the charge. Watch the return per paid crew-hour rather than the headline, because on a hardware-heavy job the headline flatters you and the per-hour figure does not.
The system is the acquisition, the refills are the business
An install is a one-off. The refill and service visits behind it are the recurring work, and they are priced apart here on purpose: each visit carries its own concentrate and its own drive, so letting their revenue sit against the install’s cost would manufacture margin out of nothing. Enter the visits per year, what you charge for one, what the concentrate costs you and the crew-hours the visit takes, and the tool reports the annual value, the contract’s own margin and a year-one total you can present alongside the install.
Before you commit to a cadence, compare it. The recurring plan comparator lines monthly, bi-monthly and quarterly plans up by annual cost, and the mosquito and tick treatment pricing calculator prices the barrier-spray alternative the system is competing with on the same property. A system and a route are different businesses, and the honest way to choose between them is to price both.
Nothing on this page selects a concentrate, sets a dilution, sizes a reservoir charge or times a spray cycle. The concentrate is one cost line here and the label is the authority everywhere else. Everything runs in your browser: no account, no email gate, nothing stored or sent. Estimate only, not a binding quote.